The Left is Going Criminally Insane

[Jeremy Roenick]

All this tells me is that Obama and his globalist masters are doing an exemplary job of dividing the people, stirring hatred, and fostering hate/race crimes.  They're going to grind America into the ground and put us at one another's throats.  Look for more character attacks in the media, false hate crimes (staged) and more planted "racists" at various rallies.

They're not going to be happy until they've torn us apart, and then they can really loot us and take our freedoms away under the guise that they know better.

If you fall for this left/right paradigm, congratulations... You're playing right into their hands.

[Flummoxed Lummox]

UPDATE!!!

Aaaaaaanndddd ... In the case of the Muslim cab-driver:

"Politico" confirms the assailant's political affiliation:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0810/AntiMuslim_attacker_works_at_proPark51_group.html

Aaaannnddd it turns out the reason the Loyal Party Member attacked the poor guy because the cabbie told him he OPPOSED the mosque.

http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/20017

Bite me.

Every mother's son of you

D-FENS,

WRONG (again).

You are correct in that the cab driver did not support the mosque near ground zero. But you are dead wrong that Michael Enwright attacked the cab driver, Ahmed Sharif, because, as you claim, " the cab driver told him he opposed the mosque." As NC Vol has already pointed out, a discussion of whether Mr. Sharif supported or opposed the mosque never occurred prior to the stabbing. Michael Enright, obviously a seriously deranged young man, stabbed Mr. Shariff ONLY because he was a Muslim.

I have no idea, and neither do you, what political views Mr. Enright holds. Given that he stabbed an innocent man because he is a Muslim, my guess (and I could be wrong) is he tends to be a rightwinger. Time will tell.

And even assuming your half-baked theory had been true, it doesn't for one minute dispel the reality that blatant racism exists in the Tea Party. Pointing out an, ostensibly, leftwing nut who goes on a rampage does not mean there is no racism among the far right fringe in the Tea Party movement.

You are a walking encyclopedia of misinformation, innuendo, and outright fabrications. Shame on you for trying to make it look like some left wing lunatic tried to kill an innocent man because he didn't support the mosque. That is pure fantasy, something you are quite prolific at creating in your warped, neocon mind.

[Sasquatch]

Uh NCVol, I believe we have stories of lefties infiltrating tea party rallies and playing race politics to see who they cold sucker into a story.

Here is JUST ONE story:

AP: Foes of Tea Party Movement to Infiltrate Rallies

http://biggovernment.com/publius/2010/04/12/ap-foes-of-tea-party-movement-to-infiltrate-rallies/

Why, even you have fallen for the "I don't need no stinkin' proof!" to "run" with a story. Have you already forgotten, in your attempts to portray Rand Paul as a kidnapping thug, you ran with a story from, as far as I know, a still unknown female Baylor swim team member? And after you posted your hit piece, this unnamed source changed her story. What is the story anyway? Interesting.

[Flummoxed Lummox]

Uh NCVol, I believe we have stories of lefties infiltrating tea party rallies and playing race politics to see who they cold sucker into a story.

Sasquatch,

I don't doubt that BOTH parties play dirty politics. I'm sure there have been examples of Democrats infiltrating GOP rallies to make Republicans look bad and vice versa. But a few isolated examples of this does not mean that the Tea Baggers aren't overtly racist. Not all of those many signs anyone can see with a Google search came from Democrats posing as Tea Baggers.

As I have said before, Mark Williams is as big a bigot as there is. He founded one of the Tea Party movements. Likewise, Ted Nugent is not a leftie. Neither is Louis Gohmert. Nor the thousands of far right fringe types who despise Obama because he happens to be black.

Face it my friend. Not all Tea Baggers are racist. But a significant percentage of the Tea Baggers are overtly racist. Just read their signs, listen to their words, and watch their behavior. They expose themselves almost daily. Not to mention that minorities avoid the movement like the plague. There's a reason they have no interest in your conservative, WHITE circle jerk, aka the Tea Baggers.

[NCVol]

Here is JUST ONE story:

AP: Foes of Tea Party Movement to Infiltrate Rallies

Have you already forgotten, in your attempts to portray Rand Paul as a kidnapping thug, you ran with a story from, as far as I know, a still unknown female Baylor swim team member? And after you posted your hit piece, this unnamed source changed her story. What is the story anyway? Interesting.

I would click on the link to check the story, but it's to Breitbart's site and he's a GD liar, so I'll pass.  

As far as Rand Paul is concerned, as I said repeatedly, he got stoned, played a prank on a coed, and part of it involved praying to the Aqua Buddha.  And she didn't actually change her story at all.  She just reiterated that it was a prank, not a kidnapping, which wasn't alleged in the original.  Rand Paul didn't even bother to deny it happened.  He denied a non-part of the story, the "kidnapping," and the "slow learner" right wingers took his non-denial as something meaningful.  

Here's the picture of Rand and his crazy college friends.  Look like they might smoke some dope from time to time to you?  Does to me!!

[Sasquatch]

As far as Rand Paul is concerned, as I said repeatedly, he got stoned, played a prank on a coed, and part of it involved praying to the Aqua Buddha.  And she didn't actually change her story at all.  She just reiterated that it was a prank, not a kidnapping, which wasn't alleged in the original.  Rand Paul didn't even bother to deny it happened.  He denied a non-part of the story, the "kidnapping," and the "slow learner" right wingers took his non-denial as something meaningful.  

Speaking of lies, YOUR original story, must I go back and post it here, said she was "forced" to do so and so. Later she says she was "not forced" to do anything. That is not a change to her story? If you are taken somewhere FORCIBLY, I would call that kidnapping, what about you? I believe you have said you cannot make up your facts as you go along.

Is it too late to bet that we will find out the name of the co-ed?

[NCVol]

I don't care about Rand Paul or his prank.  I got stoned in college a couple of times, and did stupid things more times than that, so I'm not going to be a hypocrite and complain that Rand Paul was also a crazy, pot smoking college kid at one point.

Back to the topic.  I see the WSJ is also engaging in rank stupidity with regards to the stabbing. 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703959704575453450937635686.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion

A highly plausible theory of the case is that the attacker sought to advance the narrative that America is filled with anti-Muslim bigots whose hatred is behind the opposition to the Ground Zero mosque. Had Enright succeeded in fleeing the scene, there is little doubt that the propagators of that narrative would have seized upon the crime even more aggressively than they have in making their case.

Ahmed Sharif's attacker seems to have chosen him as a victim because of his religion--a factor that, if proved, makes the attack a hate crime under New York law. If our theory is correct, the motive for this alleged anti-Muslim hate crime was bigotry against Americans.

I'm surprised the WSJ has this little respect for its readers.  I hope this appeared only online, in the editorial section, because it's written for gullible idiots, clearly.  Enright tried to KILL a man, and damn near succeeded.  He's facing most of his life in prison. He screamed this before the stabbing: ‘This is a checkpoint, motherf*****! I have to put you down!’

There are other ways to brand the right wingers - a letter, some signs, get drunk, go into a mosque, insult the people there then piss on some prayer rugs (as happened the other day), threaten to assault a black man walking through a protest by right wingers (also happened).  Attempted murder is not the way to do it.  That's real.  We don't know his motivation, but trying to slash someone's throat and almost succeeding is serious business and takes a serious, twisted, hate for the person on the other end. 

This kind of drivel is why I don't respect the WSJ anymore, not even on business matters.  If they allow this kind of nonsensical propaganda anywhere, how can you trust their reporting on serious matters?  Murdoch ruined a once fine paper, unfortunately. 

[Sasquatch]

I hope, for your guys sake, that they find something, anything to associate him with the tea party or another right-wing group. I mean that is the narrative that should be automatically assumed. So maybe we will someday have the facts to back up the assumption.

[NCVol]

I hope, for your guys sake, that they find something, anything to associate him with the tea party or another right-wing group. I mean that is the narrative that should be automatically assumed. So maybe we will someday have the facts to back up the assumption.

I haven't alleged he's with the tea party.  He's a crazed lunatic, clearly, who lost it, who the hell knows why.  He was recently in Afghanistan, embedded with troops as I understand it, so maybe he saw some stuff and can't handle it.  There are many, many veterans killing themselves, killing their spouses in some cases, suffering terrible PTSD and we've just begun to understand the problem.  Maybe it's that.  I do not know why he did it. 

What I objected to was OMG alleging the guy was a leftist and that's why he did it.  It's the same story the propaganda outlet called the WSJ is pushing.  It's not the left that is equating Muslim = terrorist = Muslim, and using that to object to the center and to the Imam, it's very high profile leaders of the GOP who are pushing that "be afraid, be very afraid, Islam is a dangerous cult" story line. 

If you don't like the story line pushed by right wingers, object to it, but don't blame it on the left that the crazies on the right are being encouraged by conservative leaders. 

[Flummoxed Lummox]

I hope, for your guys sake, that they find something, anything to associate him with the tea party or another right-wing group. I mean that is the narrative that should be automatically assumed. So maybe we will someday have the facts to back up the assumption.

I have no idea what Michael Enright's political leanings are (and neither does our resident curmudgeon, D-FENS), nor do I care. He is clearly mentally unstable regardless.

What I object to is D-FENS' feckless attempt to portray Mr. Enright as a leftist WITH NO PROOF, other than his fecund imagination. He posted TWO outright lies ("the cab driver told him he opposed the mosque" and "The slasher IS AN EMPLOYEE OF A LEFTY POLICY GROUP THAT SUPPORTS BUILDING THE MOSQUE"), with not one iota of evidence to back up his assertion, which he does on a regular basis.

1. There was no discussion of the cab driver's views on the mosque before Mr. Enright stabbed him. Enright attacked him because he is a Muslim.
2. Mr. Enright is not employed by Intersections International. He is a student. He volunteered to work for II because they helped send him to Afghanistan where he could film what he is interested in, combat stress among troops. That hardly means he is a left leaning pansy, as D-FENS wants us to believe.

Mr. Enright is also a volunteer with Intersections International, an initiative of the Collegiate Churches of New York that promotes justice and faith across religions and cultures. The organization, which covered part of Mr. Enright's travel expenses to Afghanistan, has been a staunch supporter of the Islamic center near ground zero. Mr. Enright volunteered with the group's veteran-civilian dialogue project.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703959704575453450937635686.html

And again, even if D-FENS had been right, it doesn't change the fact that the Tea Baggers have a serious problem with overt racism among their followers.

[One Man Gang]

That popping noises you've been hearing above is a paradigm shifting without a clutch.

Maybe the Media should tell Mohammedans to be careful around Leftist art students who work for "pro-Muslim" activist groups.

 

[Flummoxed Lummox]

That popping noises you've been hearing above is a paradigm shifting without a clutch.

Maybe the Media should tell Mohammedans to be careful around Leftist art students who work for "pro-Muslim" activist groups.

 

You're an imbecile.

You LIED twice about the Michael Enwright story. It's your modus operandi to post blatantly false statements. Then when others point out the fallacies of your assertions, you either run and hide or claim victory nonetheless.